On 8/14/21 4:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> Here are 2 patches against the 'usb-linus' branch of GregKH's 'usb.git' repo. >>> >>> Wait, why that branch? >> >> What branch I'd use for the fixes then? > > Ah, you really want this in for 5.14-final? Not necessarily, it's your call. But all the patches are fixes. > People are hitting this issue now? No, the patches ware all the result of the code reviews... >>> Please make them against the branch you want >>> them applied to. Hopefully they will apply to the usb-next branch... >> >> I didn't intend them for usb-next but looks like they apply there too. > > I think it belongs there as a "nice cleanup to have", right? No, they're definitely not cleanups and all have the "Fixes:" tags, so going to end up in the stable trees (some already have). There's going to be 10-patch series soon, all fixing the deferred probing due to platfrorm_get_irq()... Luckily, the USB tree doesn't shave the 3rd kind of platfrorm_get_irq() bugs: treating 0 as error and returning it immediately along with the negative values, without doing the remaining part of probe... > thanks, > > greg k-h MBR, Sergey
