Re: [PATCH] USB: usbtmc: Fix RCU stall warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Greg KH
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 11:48 AM
> Subject: *EXT* Re: [PATCH] USB: usbtmc: Fix RCU stall warning
> 
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:44:23AM +0200, dave penkler wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 09:52, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:41:15AM +0200, dave penkler wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 09:08, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:32:36AM +0800, qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> > > > > > From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > I need a "full" name here, and in the signed-off-by line please.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
> > > > > > rcu:    1-...!: (2 ticks this GP) idle=d92/1/0x4000000000000000
> > > > > >         softirq=25390/25392 fqs=3
> > > > > >         (t=12164 jiffies g=31645 q=43226)
> > > > > > rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 12162 jiffies! g31645 f0x0
> > > > > >      RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0
> > > > > > rcu:    Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time,
> > > > > >         OOM is now expected behavior.
> > > > > > rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
> > > > > > task:rcu_preempt     state:R  running task
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the case of system use dummy_hcd as usb controller, when
> > > > > > the usbtmc devices is disconnected, in usbtmc_interrupt(), if
> > > > > > the urb status is unknown, the urb will be resubmit, the urb
> > > > > > may be insert to dum_hcd->urbp_list again, this will cause the
> > > > > > dummy_timer() not to exit for a long time, beacause the
> > > > > > dummy_timer() be called in softirq and local_bh is disable,
> > > > > > this not only causes the RCU reading critical area to consume
> > > > > > too much time but also makes the tasks in the current CPU runq not run
> in time, and that triggered RCU stall.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > return directly when find the urb status is not zero to fix it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reported-by:
> > > > > > syzbot+e2eae5639e7203360018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > What commit does this fix?  Does it need to go to stable kernels?
> > > > >
> > > > > What about the usbtmc maintainers, what do they think about this?
> > > >
> > > > This patch makes the babbling endpoint retry/recovery code in the
> > > > real world usb host controller drivers redundant and would prevent
> > > > usbtmc applications from benefiting from it.
> > >
> > > I do not understand, is this change ok or not?
> > >
> > > Why do usbtmc applications need to know if babbling happens or not?
> > >
> > > confused,
> > Sorry, the issue this patch is trying to fix occurs because the
> > current usbtmc driver resubmits the URB when it gets an EPROTO return.
> > The dummy usb host controller driver used in the syzbot tests keeps
> > returning the resubmitted URB with EPROTO causing a loop that starves
> > RCU. With an actual HCI driver it either recovers or returns an EPIPE.
> > In either case no loop occurs. So for my part as a user and maintainer
> > this patch is not ok.
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> Zqiang, can you fix this patch up based on this please?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Qiang,

After discussions with Alan and Dave we think that fixing the usbtmc driver is the best approach to fix the RCU stall warning.
Your first proposal was almost ok, but I think we should use dev_dbg() instead of dev_err() to avoid printing the EPROTO errors. See below:

Please feel free to add the following text to your patch description.

-Guido


The function usbtmc_interrupt() resubmits urbs when the error status
of an urb is -EPROTO. In systems using the dummy_hcd usb controller
this can result in endless interrupt loops when the usbtmc device is
disconnected from the host system.
    
Since host controller drivers already try to recover from transmission
errors, there is no need to resubmit the urb or try other solutions
to repair the error situation.
    
In case of errors the INT pipe just stops to wait for further packets.

Reviewed-by: Guido Kiener <guido.kiener@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
index 74d5a9c5238a..73f419adce61 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
@@ -2324,17 +2324,10 @@ static void usbtmc_interrupt(struct urb *urb)
                dev_err(dev, "overflow with length %d, actual length is %d\n",
                        data->iin_wMaxPacketSize, urb->actual_length);
                fallthrough;
-       case -ECONNRESET:
-       case -ENOENT:
-       case -ESHUTDOWN:
-       case -EILSEQ:
-       case -ETIME:
-       case -EPIPE:
+       default:
                /* urb terminated, clean up */
                dev_dbg(dev, "urb terminated, status: %d\n", status);
                return;
-       default:
-               dev_err(dev, "unknown status received: %d\n", status);
        }
 exit:
        rv = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC);




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux