Re: [PATCH] USB: usbtmc: Fix RCU stall warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




________________________________________
From: dave penkler <dpenkler@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2021 15:41
To: Greg KH
Cc: Zhang, Qiang; Alan Stern; Dmitry Vyukov; paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx; Guido; USB
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: usbtmc: Fix RCU stall warning

[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]

On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 09:08, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:32:36AM +0800, qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I need a "full" name here, and in the signed-off-by line please.
>
> >
> > rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
> > rcu:    1-...!: (2 ticks this GP) idle=d92/1/0x4000000000000000
> >         softirq=25390/25392 fqs=3
> >         (t=12164 jiffies g=31645 q=43226)
> > rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 12162 jiffies! g31645 f0x0
> >      RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0
> > rcu:    Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time,
> >         OOM is now expected behavior.
> > rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
> > task:rcu_preempt     state:R  running task
> >
> > In the case of system use dummy_hcd as usb controller, when the
> > usbtmc devices is disconnected, in usbtmc_interrupt(), if the urb
> > status is unknown, the urb will be resubmit, the urb may be insert
> > to dum_hcd->urbp_list again, this will cause the dummy_timer() not
> > to exit for a long time, beacause the dummy_timer() be called in
> > softirq and local_bh is disable, this not only causes the RCU reading
> > critical area to consume too much time but also makes the tasks in
> > the current CPU runq not run in time, and that triggered RCU stall.
> >
> > return directly when find the urb status is not zero to fix it.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+e2eae5639e7203360018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> What commit does this fix?  Does it need to go to stable kernels?
>
> What about the usbtmc maintainers, what do they think about this?

>This patch makes the babbling endpoint retry/recovery code in the real
>world usb host controller drivers redundant and would prevent usbtmc
>applications from benefiting from it.

Due to use dummy_hcd host,  as explained earlier  the RCU stall happens all the time,  Is there a better way to solve it ?

Thanks
Qiang
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux