On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:47:56PM +0000, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 10.06.2021 02:07, Alan Stern wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 03:10:27PM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > >> On SAMA7G5 suspending ports will cut the access to OHCI registers and > >> any subsequent access to them will lead to CPU being blocked trying to > >> access that memory. Same thing happens on resume: if OHCI memory is > >> accessed before resuming ports the CPU will block on that access. The > >> OCHI memory is accessed on suspend/resume though > >> ohci_suspend()/ohci_resume(). > > > > That sounds very strange. > > The clock scheme for OHCI and EHCI IPs on SAMA7G5 is as follows > (I hope it is readable): > > Main Xtal > | > +-------------+ > | | > +---------------------------+ \ / | > | +------+ | 60MHz +--------------------+ | > | | | | | |------+ > | | Port |<----------| UTMI Transceiver A | | | > | | | | | |----+ | > | USB 2.0 EHCI |Router| | +--------------------+ | | | > | Host Controller | | | 60MHz +--------------------+ | | | > | | |<----------| UTMI Transceiver B |<-+ | | > | | | | +--------------------+ | | | > | | | | 60MHz +--------------------+ | | | > | | |<----------| UTMI Transceiver C |<-+ | | > | | | | +--------------------+ | | > | +------+ | | | > | | | | > +---------------------------+ | | > | | > +---------------------------+ | | > | +------+ | UHP48M | | > | | Root | |<---------------------------------+ | > | USB 1.1 OHCI | hub | | | > | Host Controller | and | | UHP12M | > | | host | |<-----------------------------------+ > | | SIE | | > | +------+ | > | | > +---------------------------+ > > Where UTMI transceiver A generates the 48MHz and 12MHz clocks for OHCI > full-speed operations. > > The ports control is done through AT91_SFR_OHCIICR via > ohci_at91_port_suspend() function where. Setting 0 in AT91_SFR_OHCIICR > means suspend is controlled by EHCI-OHCI and 1 forces the port suspend. > Suspending the port A will cut the clocks for OHCI. I want to mention that > AT91_SFR_OHCIICR register is not in the same memory space of OHCI, EHCI IPs > and is clocked by other clocks. > > > Suppose one of the ports is suspended, so access to the > > OHCI registers is blocked. Then how can you resume the port? > > For run-time control (via ohci_at91_hub_control()), I agree with you that > the current implemented approach is not healthy (taking into account the > clock scheme above) and the fact that we do force the ports suspend on > ohci_at91_hub_control(). For suspend/resume it should be OK as the ports > are suspended at the end of any OHCI accesses (I don't know how the Linux > USB subsystem behaves so please do correct me if I'm wrong). (I haven't checked the details recently, so I'm not certain about this.) In some -- perhaps all -- cases, we don't suspend the ports at all during system suspend. We just rely on the USB devices automatically going into suspend when the root hub stops sending packets. > > Don't you have to > > access the OHCI registers in order to tell the controller to do the port resume? > > On our implementation we control the port suspend/resume via > AT91_SFR_OHCIICR, a special kind of register, memory mapped at different > address (compared w/ OHCI, EHCI IPs), so clocked by other clocks. > > > > > What happens when there's more than one port, and one of them is suspended while > > the other one is still running? How can you communicate with the active port if > > access to the OHCI registers is blocked? > > For this kind of scenario (the run-time suspend of a port, not system > suspend/resume) a different mechanism should be implemented taking into > account the clock schema presented above. Okay, I see. It seems like the driver will need some significant changes to handle runtime power management properly. One thing you might consider changing: The name of the ohci_at91_port_suspend routine is misleading. It doesn't really handle suspending the port; instead it handles the clocks that drive the entire OHCI controller. Right? Alan Stern