Hi Heiko,
Am 18.06.21 um 15:08 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
Am Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2021, 06:49:54 CEST schrieb Alex Bee:
Rock Pi 4a plus board is the successor of Rock Pi 4a board.
Differences to the original version are
- has RK3399 OP1 SoC revision
- has eMMC (16 or 32 GB) soldered on board (no changes required,
since it is enabled in rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi)
- dev boards have SPI flash soldered, but as per manufacturer response,
this won't be the case for mass production boards
I didn't add yet another compatible, since the small set of differences
are captured by the device tree.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
.../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
index c3e00c0e2db7..dbd7d37950f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-puma-haikou.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4b.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4c.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock960.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2deaab7f9307
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Akash Gajjar <Akash_Gajjar@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Pragnesh Patel <Pragnesh_Patel@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi"
+#include "rk3399-op1-opp.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Radxa ROCK Pi 4A plus";
+ compatible = "radxa,rockpi4a", "radxa,rockpi4", "rockchip,rk3399";
hmm, I don't really follow why you're re-using the radxa,rockpi4a
compatible. I'd assume this should be radxa,rockpi4a+ or something?
Ah, yes this was part of my cover letter, which obviously got lost
somewhere.
Anyways: Reason I thought of was: For example broadcom nvram file names
must match the compatible string and they have to be copied/symlinked
over and over if we add new compatibles for every minor changed revision
of a board. I guess there are more examples for that in userland.
I.e. if a bootloader needs to select the matching devicetree from a list
of available devicetrees, this could end up running a regular rockpi4a
(without +) using the OP1 operating points and thus at way too high
frequencies.
Besides I wasn't aware, that "a bootloader" can do that already I
understand your concerns and will change it.
Alex.
Heiko
+};
