On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Tuesday 18 August 2009 17:43:23 Alan Stern wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > this patch series introduces an endpoint claim/release interface for > > > function drivers to dispatch requests targeted at endpoints to the > > > correct function driver. > > > > It's not clear why this should be needed. Don't function drivers > > already allocate endpoints amongst themselves as part of configuration > > initialization? > > Do they, but they don't establish an endpoint -> function ownership link. > > > After all, we can't have two different interfaces trying to use the same > > endpoint. > > Except in different configurations. Actually it seems multiple configurations > are not well supported today. The infrastructure is there, but function > drivers allocate their endpoints globally at the gadget level and not at the > configuration level. > > > If this is a matter of figuring out which function driver owns an > > endpoint, can't that be done by searching through the endpoint > > descriptors for each function's active interfaces? > > In that case I would have to loop over all functions for the active > configuration (easy) and parse all descriptors for the correct speed to locate > endpoint descriptors. That should be possible, would the overhead be ok ? It might be; I don't have a good feel for it. Alternatively, the framework could set up the ownership links itself by reading the descriptors just once, while processing the Set-Config request. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
