* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [210609 12:00]:
> * Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [210609 09:26]:
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 11:05:35AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Simplify cable state handling a bit to leave out duplicated code.
> > > We are just scheduling work and showing state info if a recheck is
> > > needed. No intended functional changes.
> > >
> > > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Bhushan Shah <bshah@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > Does not apply to my usb-next branch, what tree/branch did you make this
> > against?
>
> This was against Linux next last week, I'll take a look and
> repost.
Looks like the issue applying these patches is caused by commit
b65ba0c362be ("usb: musb: fix MUSB_QUIRK_B_DISCONNECT_99 handling")
that is in usb-linus but not in usb-next.
Probably best to merge usb-linus to usb-next and then these patches
apply no problem and a merge conflict is avoided?
Let me know if you still want me to repost against usb-next, I can
do that no problem if you prefer that :)
Regards,
Tony
