On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 05:35:45PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx> writes: > > On 6/3/21 12:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > >>> Hello Felipe, > >>> > >>> Thank you for having a look! > >>> > >>> On 6/3/21 7:30 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx> writes: > >>>>> I've been seeing the following panic when shutting down my rockpro64: > >>>>> > >>>>> [�� 21.459064] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: USB bus 5 deregistered > >>>>> [�� 21.683077] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > >>>>> 00000000000000a0 > >>>>> [�� 21.683858] Mem abort info: > >>>>> [�� 21.684104]�� ESR = 0x96000004 > >>>>> [�� 21.684375]�� EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > >>>>> [�� 21.684841]�� SET = 0, FnV = 0 > >>>>> [�� 21.685111]�� EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > >>>>> [�� 21.685389] Data abort info: > >>>>> [�� 21.685644]�� ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > >>>>> [�� 21.686024]�� CM = 0, WnR = 0 > >>>>> [�� 21.686288] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000000757a000 > >>>>> [�� 21.686853] [00000000000000a0] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 > >>>>> [�� 21.687452] Internal error: Oops: 96000004EEMPT SMP > >>>>> [�� 21.687941] Modules linked in: > >>>>> [�� 21.688214] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: shutdown Not tainted > >>>>> 5.12.0-rc7-00262-g568262bf5492 #33 > >>>>> [�� 21.688915] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT) > >>>>> [�� 21.689357] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) > >>>>> [�� 21.689884] pc : down_read_interruptible+0xec/0x200 > >>>>> [�� 21.690321] lr : simple_recursive_removal+0x48/0x280 > >>>>> [�� 21.690761] sp : ffff800011f4b940 > >>>>> [�� 21.691053] x29: ffff800011f4b940 x28: ffff000000809b40 > >>>>> [�� 21.691522] x27: ffff000000809b98 x26: ffff8000114f5170 > >>>>> [�� 21.691990] x25: 00000000000000a0 x24: ffff800011e84030 > >>>>> [�� 21.692459] x23: 0000000000000080 x22: 0000000000000000 > >>>>> [�� 21.692927] x21: ffff800011ecaa5c x20: ffff800011ecaa60 > >>>>> [�� 21.693395] x19: ffff000000809b40 x18: ffffffffffffffff > >>>>> [�� 21.693863] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 > >>>>> [�� 21.694331] x15: ffff800091f4ba6d x14: 0000000000000004 > >>>>> [�� 21.694799] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000020 > >>>>> [�� 21.695267] x11: 0101010101010101 x10: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f > >>>>> [�� 21.695735] x9 : 6f6c746364716e62 x8 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f > >>>>> [�� 21.696203] x7 : fefefeff6364626d x6 : 0000000000001bd8 > >>>>> [�� 21.696671] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 > >>>>> [�� 21.697138] x3 : 00000000000000a0 x2 : 0000000000000001 > >>>>> [�� 21.697606] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 00000000000000a0 > >>>>> [�� 21.698075] Call trace: > >>>>> [�� 21.698291]� down_read_interruptible+0xec/0x200 > >>>>> [�� 21.698690]� debugfs_remove+0x60/0x84 > >>>>> [�� 21.699016]� dwc3_debugfs_exit+0x1c/0x6c > >>>>> [�� 21.699363]� dwc3_remove+0x34/0x1a0 > >>>>> [�� 21.699672]� platform_remove+0x28/0x60 > >>>>> [�� 21.700005]� __device_release_driver+0x188/0x230 > >>>>> [�� 21.700414]� device_release_driver+0x2c/0x44 > >>>>> [�� 21.700791]� bus_remove_device+0x124/0x130 > >>>>> [�� 21.701154]� device_del+0x168/0x420 > >>>>> [�� 21.701462]� platform_device_del.part.0+0x1c/0x90 > >>>>> [�� 21.701877]� platform_device_unregister+0x28/0x44 > >>>>> [�� 21.702291]� of_platform_device_destroy+0xe8/0x100 > >>>>> [�� 21.702716]� device_for_each_child_reverse+0x64/0xb4 > >>>>> [�� 21.703153]� of_platform_depopulate+0x40/0x84 > >>>>> [�� 21.703538]� __dwc3_of_simple_teardown+0x20/0xd4 > >>>>> [�� 21.703945]� dwc3_of_simple_shutdown+0x14/0x20 > >>>>> [�� 21.704337]� platform_shutdown+0x28/0x40 > >>>>> [�� 21.704683]� device_shutdown+0x158/0x330 > >>>>> [�� 21.705029]� kernel_power_off+0x38/0x7c > >>>>> [�� 21.705372]� __do_sys_reboot+0x16c/0x2a0 > >>>>> [�� 21.705719]� __arm64_sys_reboot+0x28/0x34 > >>>>> [�� 21.706074]� el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x60/0x120 > >>>>> [�� 21.706499]� do_el0_svc+0x28/0x94 > >>>>> [�� 21.706794]� el0_svc+0x2c/0x54 > >>>>> [�� 21.707067]� el0_sync_handler+0xa4/0x130 > >>>>> [�� 21.707414]� el0_sync+0x170/0x180 > >>>>> [�� 21.707711] Code: c8047c62 35ffff84 17fffe5f f9800071 (c85ffc60) > >>>>> [�� 21.708250] ---[ end trace 5ae08147542eb468 ]--- > >>>>> [�� 21.708667] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b > >>>>> [�� 21.709456] Kernel Offset: disabled > >>>>> [�� 21.709762] CPU features: 0x00240022,2100600c > >>>>> [�� 21.710146] Memory Limit: 2048 MB > >>>>> [�� 21.710443] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! > >>>>> exitcode=0x0000000b ]--- > >>>>> > >>>>> I've been able to bisect the panic and the offending commit is 568262bf5492 ("usb: > >>>>> dwc3: core: Add shutdown callback for dwc3"). I can provide more diagnostic > >>>>> information if needed and I can help test the fix. > >>>> if you simply revert that commit in HEAD, does the problem really go > >>>> away? > >>> Kernel built from commit 324c92e5e0ee, which is the kernel tip today, the panic is > >>> there. Reverting the offending commit, 568262bf5492, makes the panic disappear. > >> Want to send a revert so I can take it now? > > > > I can send a revert, but Felipe was asking Sandeep (the commit author) for a fix, > > so I'll leave it up to Felipe to decide how to proceed. > > I'm okay with a revert. Feel free to add my Acked-by: Felipe Balbi > <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> or it. > > Sandeep, please send a new version that doesn't encounter the same > issue. Make sure to test by reloading the driver in a tight loop for > several iterations. This would probably be tricky to test on other "glue" drivers as the problem appears to be specific only to dwc3_of_simple. It looks like both dwc3_of_simple and the dwc3 core now (due to 568262bf5492) each implement respective .shutdown callbacks. The latter is simply a wrapper around dwc3_remove(). And from the panic call stack above we see that dwc3_of_simple_shutdown() calls of_platform_depopulate() which will again call dwc3_remove() resulting in the double remove. So would an alternative approach be to protect against dwc3_remove() getting called multiple times? IMO it'd be a bit messy to have to add additional checks there to know if it had already been called. So maybe avoid it altogether--should dwc3_of_simple_shutdown() just skip calling of_platform_depopulate()? Jack -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project