On 5/21/21 6:01 AM, Kyle Tso wrote:
If snk_vdo is not populated from fwnode, it implies the port does not
support responding to SVDM commands. Not_Supported Message shall be sent
if the contract is in PD3. And for PD2, the port shall ignore the
commands.
Fixes: 193a68011fdc ("staging: typec: tcpm: Respond to Discover Identity commands")
Signed-off-by: Kyle Tso <kyletso@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
index deb8a9d01f73..d32caa875d9a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
@@ -2430,7 +2430,10 @@ static void tcpm_pd_data_request(struct tcpm_port *port,
NONE_AMS);
break;
case PD_DATA_VENDOR_DEF:
- tcpm_handle_vdm_request(port, msg->payload, cnt);
+ if (tcpm_vdm_ams(port) || port->nr_snk_vdo)
+ tcpm_handle_vdm_request(port, msg->payload, cnt);
+ else if (port->negotiated_rev > PD_REV20)
+ tcpm_pd_handle_msg(port, PD_MSG_CTRL_NOT_SUPP, NONE_AMS);
break;
case PD_DATA_BIST:
port->bist_request = le32_to_cpu(msg->payload[0]);
