Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:33 PM [...] > The real motivation here, which nobody has mentioned explicitly yet, is > that the driver needs to be careful enough that it won't crash no matter > what bizarre, malfunctioning, or malicious device is attached. > > Even if a device isn't malicious, if it is buggy, broken, or > malfunctioning in some way then it can present input that a normal > device would never generate. If the driver isn't prepared to handle > this unusual input, it may crash. That is specifically what we want to > avoid. > > So if a peculiar emulated device created by syzbot is capable of > crashing the driver, then somewhere there is a bug which needs to be > fixed. It's true that fixing all these bugs might not protect against a > malicious device which deliberately behaves in an apparently reasonable > manner. But it does reduce the attack surface. Thanks for your response. I will add some checks. Best Regards, Hayes