Re: [PATCH] unbreak all modern Seagate ATA pass-through for SMART

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg KH wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 09:20:59AM +0200, René Rebe wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > > On 25. Apr 2021, at 04:31, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> Seagate devices" in 2017. Apparently some early ones where buggy, ...
> > >> 
> > >> However, fast forward a couple of years and this is no longer true,
> > >> this Segate Seven even is already from 2016, and apparently first
> > >> available in 2015. I suggest removing this rather drastic global
> > >> measure, and instead only add very old broken ones with individual
> > >> quirks, should any of them still be alive ;-)
> > >> 
> > >> Signed-off-by: René Rebe <rene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> 
> > >> --- linux-5.11/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h.backup	2021-03-05 11:36:00.517423726 +0100
> > >> +++ linux-5.11/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h	2021-03-05 11:36:16.373424544 +0100
> > >> @@ -113,8 +113,4 @@
> > >> 	}
> > >> 
> > >> -	/* All Seagate disk enclosures have broken ATA pass-through support */
> > >> -	if (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor) == 0x0bc2)
> > >> -		flags |= US_FL_NO_ATA_1X;
> > >> -
> > >> 	usb_stor_adjust_quirks(udev, &flags);
> > > 
> > > I don't want to do this unless you can suggest an approach that won't 
> > > suddenly break all those old buggy drives.  Just because they are now 
> > > five years old or more doesn't mean they are no longer in use.
> > 
> > Well, what do you propose then? A allow quirk for all new devices going forward?
> > Given that the user usually needs to actively run something like smartctl
> > manually on the drive I don’t see that this should cause too many issues.
> > I don’t have any non-supporting device - can we not just add them to the
> > quirk list when someone reports one?
> 
> How about since you know your device works, you make the check detect
> your specific device and not apply the flag to it?  You should be able
> to do so based on the

Sure, while that does not really solve this for all the other newer
Seagate drives other users might have at home, here is a patch
checking for this one USB product ID. I hope that is what you meant:

Signed-off-by: René Rebe <rene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--- linux-5.11/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h.backup	2021-03-05 11:36:00.517423726 +0100
+++ linux-5.11/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h	2021-03-05 11:36:16.373424544 +0100
@@ -113,5 +113,6 @@
 
 	/* All Seagate disk enclosures have broken ATA pass-through support */
-	if (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor) == 0x0bc2)
+	if ((le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor) == 0x0bc2) &&
+	    (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idProduct) != 0xab03))
 		flags |= US_FL_NO_ATA_1X;
 

-- 
  René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin
  https://exactcode.com | https://t2sde.org | https://rene.rebe.de




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux