On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:06 PM Wesley Cheng <wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 3/22/2021 12:34 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 8:49 PM Wesley Cheng <wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Andy,
> >>
> >> On 3/22/2021 5:48 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:01 AM Wesley Cheng <wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> In the situations where the DWC3 gadget stops active transfers, once
> >>>> calling the dwc3_gadget_giveback(), there is a chance where a function
> >>>> driver can queue a new USB request in between the time where the dwc3
> >>>> lock has been released and re-aquired. This occurs after we've already
> >>>> issued an ENDXFER command. When the stop active transfers continues
> >>>> to remove USB requests from all dep lists, the newly added request will
> >>>> also be removed, while controller still has an active TRB for it.
> >>>> This can lead to the controller accessing an unmapped memory address.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fix this by ensuring parameters to prevent EP queuing are set before
> >>>> calling the stop active transfers API.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> commit f09ddcfcb8c569675066337adac2ac205113471f
> >>> Author: Wesley Cheng <wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Date: Thu Mar 11 15:59:02 2021 -0800
> >>>
> >>> usb: dwc3: gadget: Prevent EP queuing while stopping transfers
> >>>
> >>> effectively broke my gadget setup.
> >>>
> >>> The output of the kernel (followed by non responsive state of USB controller):
> >>>
> >>> [ 195.228586] using random self ethernet address
> >>> [ 195.233104] using random host ethernet address
> >>> [ 195.245306] usb0: HOST MAC aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f2
> >>> [ 195.249732] usb0: MAC aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f1
> >>> # [ 195.773594] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): usb0: link becomes ready
> >>> [ 195.780585] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>> [ 195.785217] dwc3 dwc3.0.auto: No resource for ep2in
> >>> [ 195.790162] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 217 at
> >>> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c:360 dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd+0x4b9/0x670
> >>> [ 195.799760] Modules linked in: usb_f_eem u_ether libcomposite
> >>> brcmfmac brcmutil mmc_block pwm_lpss_pci pwm_lps
> >>> s snd_sof_pci_intel_tng snd_sof_pci snd_sof_acpi_intel_byt
> >>> snd_sof_intel_ipc snd_sof_acpi snd_sof snd_sof_nocodec
> >>> spi_pxa2xx_platform snd_sof_xtensa_dsp spi_pxa2xx_pci
> >>> extcon_intel_mrfld intel_mrfld_adc sdhci_pci cqhci sdhci m
> >>> mc_core intel_mrfld_pwrbtn intel_soc_pmic_mrfld hci_uart btbcm btintel
> >>> [ 195.835604] CPU: 0 PID: 217 Comm: irq/16-dwc3 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ #60
> >>> [ 195.842403] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Merrifield/BODEGA BAY,
> >>> BIOS 542 2015.01.21:18.19.48
> >>> [ 195.851191] RIP: 0010:dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd+0x4b9/0x670
> >>> [ 195.856608] Code: cd 00 00 00 44 89 44 24 20 48 89 4c 24 18 e8 ee
> >>> f7 e4 ff 48 8b 4c 24 18 4c 89 f2 48 c7 c7 b9
> >>> ed 4f a0 48 89 c6 e8 ef 24 43 00 <0f> 0b 41 be ea ff ff ff 44 8b 44 24
> >>> 20 e9 80 fc ff ff 41 83 fe 92
> >>> [ 195.875381] RSP: 0000:ffffa53c00373ba8 EFLAGS: 00010086
> >>> [ 195.880617] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000001387 RCX: 00000000ffffdfff
> >>> [ 195.887755] RDX: 00000000ffffdfff RSI: 00000000ffffffea RDI: 0000000000000000
> >>> [ 195.894893] RBP: ffff9ce8c8f2b028 R08: ffffffffa0732288 R09: 0000000000009ffb
> >>> [ 195.902034] R10: 00000000ffffe000 R11: 3fffffffffffffff R12: 0000000000041006
> >>> [ 195.909170] R13: ffffa53c00373c24 R14: ffff9ce8c11dadb0 R15: ffff9ce8c2861700
> >>> [ 195.916310] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ce8fe200000(0000)
> >>> knlGS:0000000000000000
> >>> [ 195.924409] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> >>> [ 195.930161] CR2: 00000000f7f694a0 CR3: 0000000038e0c000 CR4: 00000000001006f0
> >>> [ 195.937300] Call Trace:
> >>> [ 195.939755] __dwc3_gadget_ep_enable+0x2d4/0x4e0
> >>> [ 195.944393] ? dwc3_remove_requests.constprop.0+0x86/0x170
> >>
> >> Odd that this change would affect the USB enablment path, as they were
> >> focused on the pullup disable path. Would you happen to have any
> >> downstream changes on top of v5.12-rc4 we could review to see if they
> >> are still required? (ie where is the dwc3_remove_requests() coming from
> >> during ep enable)
> >
> > You may check my branch [1] on GH. Basically you may be interested in
> > the commit:
> > 0f86df1294ee7523060cc16eafaf4898c693eab0 REVERTME: usb: dwc3: gadget:
> > skip endpoints ep[18]{in,out}
> > Otherwise it's a clean v5.12-rc4 with a revert and another USB PHY
> > suspend fix (which also shouldn't affect this).
>
> Can you link your GH reference?
Oops, sorry.
Here we are:
[1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/linux/tree/eds-acpi
> >
> > But I don't believe it should have affected this.
> >
> >>> [ 195.949897] dwc3_gadget_ep_enable+0x5d/0x120
> >>> [ 195.954274] usb_ep_enable+0x27/0x80
> >>> [ 195.957869] gether_connect+0x32/0x1f0 [u_ether]
> >>> [ 195.962512] eem_set_alt+0x6d/0x140 [usb_f_eem]
> >>> [ 195.967061] composite_setup+0x224/0x1ba0 [libcomposite]
> >>> [ 195.972405] ? debug_dma_unmap_page+0x79/0x80
> >>> [ 195.976782] ? configfs_composite_setup+0x6b/0x90 [libcomposite]
> >>> [ 195.982811] configfs_composite_setup+0x6b/0x90 [libcomposite]
> >>> [ 195.988668] dwc3_ep0_interrupt+0x459/0xa50
> >>> [ 195.992869] dwc3_thread_interrupt+0x8e2/0xee0
> >>> [ 195.997327] ? __schedule+0x237/0x6d0
> >>> [ 196.001005] ? disable_irq_nosync+0x10/0x10
> >>> [ 196.005200] irq_thread_fn+0x1b/0x60
> >>> [ 196.008789] irq_thread+0xd6/0x170
> >>> [ 196.012202] ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0x70/0x70
> >>> [ 196.017004] ? irq_forced_thread_fn+0x70/0x70
> >>> [ 196.021373] kthread+0x116/0x130
> >>> [ 196.024617] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x60/0x60
> >>> [ 196.029680] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> >>> [ 196.033272] ---[ end trace 8dd104a950d8d248 ]---
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Also, as I mentioned above, the changes should affect the pullup disable
> >> path, so when you 'echo "" > UDC' or something similar to that
> >> operation, did you see any errors?
> >
> > After your patch I see a warning as above. Before — no errors or warnings.
> >
> >> Can you provide a ftrace output w/
> >> the DWC3 tracing enabled once removing the UDC?
> >
> > Can you provide step-by-step instructions what should I do?
> >
> Let me try with your kernel, and steps below first.
>
> Thanks
> Wesley Cheng
>
> >>> Revert helps (I'm on v5.12-rc4 now with a revert).
> >>>
> >>> The script to enable gadget:
> >>>
> >>> #!/bin/sh -efu
> >>>
> >>> # Mounting CONFIGFS
> >>> grep -q -w /sys/kernel/config /proc/mounts || mount -t configfs none
> >>> /sys/kernel/config
> >>>
> >>> # Addresses and files
> >>> readonly GADGET_BASE_DIR="/sys/kernel/config/usb_gadget/g1"
> >>> readonly DEV_ETH_ADDR="aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f1"
> >>> readonly HOST_ETH_ADDR="aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f2"
> >>> readonly USBDISK="/usbdisk.img"
> >>>
> >>> # Insert modules
> >>> modprobe libcomposite
> >>>
> >>> # Create directory structure
> >>> mkdir "${GADGET_BASE_DIR}"
> >>> cd "${GADGET_BASE_DIR}"
> >>> mkdir -p configs/c.1/strings/0x409
> >>> mkdir -p strings/0x409
> >>>
> >>> # Ethernet device
> >>> mkdir functions/eem.usb0
> >>> echo "${DEV_ETH_ADDR}" > functions/eem.usb0/dev_addr
> >>> echo "${HOST_ETH_ADDR}" > functions/eem.usb0/host_addr
> >>> ln -s functions/eem.usb0 configs/c.1/
> >>>
> >>> # Composite Gadget Setup
> >>> echo 0x1d6b > idVendor # Linux Foundation
> >>> echo 0x0104 > idProduct # Multifunction Composite Gadget
> >>> echo 0x0100 > bcdDevice # v1.0.0
> >>> echo 0x0200 > bcdUSB # USB2
> >>> echo "0123456789abcdef" > strings/0x409/serialnumber
> >>> echo "USBArmory" > strings/0x409/manufacturer
> >>> echo "USBArmory Gadget" > strings/0x409/product
> >>> echo "Conf1" > configs/c.1/strings/0x409/configuration
> >>> echo 120 > configs/c.1/MaxPower
> >>>
> >>> # Activate gadgets
> >>> echo dwc3.0.auto > UDC
> >>>
> >>> Please, tell me how to fix this, otherwise I will have to send a revert.
> >>>
> >> This also fixes a potential SMMU fault on targets with that enabled. It
> >> causes the controller to access a stale TRB DMA address after it has
> >> already been unmapped. I think we should figure out what is causing the
> >> issue on your set up instead of reverting the entire change.
> >
> > If we find a cause and have a fix during this week, otherwise it's
> > rc5:ish timing when we may not have more time to play.
> >
>
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
