>
> This has to be with the patch revision number, i.e. [PATCH v2] , [PATCH v3]
> etc.
>
> On 2/5/2021 5:02 PM, Prike Liang wrote:
> > The XHCI is required enter D3hot rather than D3cold for AMD s2idle
> solution.
> > Otherwise, the 'Controller Not Ready' (CNR) bit not being cleared by
> > host in resume and eventually result in xhci resume failed in s2idle wakeup
> period.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 6 +++++-
> > drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> > index 3feaafe..8ecde66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> > @@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev,
> struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
> > (pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_PROMONTORYA_1)))
> > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_U2_DISABLE_WAKE;
> >
> > + if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD &&
> > + pdev->device == 0x1639)
> > + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_AMD_S2IDL_SUPPORT_QUIRK;
> > +
> > if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL) {
> > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_LPM_SUPPORT;
> > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_INTEL_HOST;
> > @@ -500,7 +504,7 @@ static int xhci_pci_suspend(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
> bool do_wakeup)
> > * Systems with the TI redriver that loses port status change events
> > * need to have the registers polled during D3, so avoid D3cold.
> > */
> > - if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_COMP_MODE_QUIRK)
> > + if (xhci->quirks & (XHCI_COMP_MODE_QUIRK |
> > +XHCI_AMD_S2IDL_SUPPORT_QUIRK))
> > pci_d3cold_disable(pdev);
> >
> > if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_PME_STUCK_QUIRK) diff --git
> > a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h index
> > ea1754f..fafa044 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > @@ -1874,6 +1874,7 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
> > #define XHCI_RESET_PLL_ON_DISCONNECT BIT_ULL(34)
> > #define XHCI_SNPS_BROKEN_SUSPEND BIT_ULL(35)
> > #define XHCI_RENESAS_FW_QUIRK BIT_ULL(36)
> > +#define XHCI_AMD_S2IDL_SUPPORT_QUIRK BIT_ULL(37)
>
> Why don't we keep it the fullname i.e. XHCI_AMD_S2IDLE_SUPPORT_QUIRK
> instead of XHCI_AMD_S2IDL_SUPPORT_QUIRK, likewise at all places?
>
> -Shyam
[Prike] Thanks for your comment and the primary patch with compliance mode quirk has been dropped and this patch
seems totally different with compliance mode partial enablement fix. Anyway I will give the patch modified detail in the commit. The XHCI_AMD_S2IDL_SUPPORT_QUIRK is a typo and I will correct it.
Thanks,
Prike
