On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 4:16 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 04:06:49PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 4:02 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:48:03AM -0800, syzbot wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue: > > > > WARNING in yurex_write/usb_submit_urb > > > > > > It appears syzbot never tested the patch from the thread. Probably using > > > it's mail interface incorrectly, I don't know and I don't have time to > > > investigate. The patch itself is correct. > > > > Hi Johan, > > > > I wasn't CCed on the testing request, so I can't say what exactly was wrong. > > Here's the patch and the "syz test" command in a reply: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201214104444.28386-1-johan@xxxxxxxxxx > > Probably needs to go in the same mail, right? Yes, both the syz test command and the patch must be in the same email, which is sent as a response to the initial report. > How about including the command needed to test a patch in the syzbot > report mail to assist the casual user of its interfaces? I had to browse > the web page you link to and still got it wrong apparently. I think it's deliberately not included to not overload the report email with too many details. > > Could you send me the patch you were trying to test? > > Does this work better: > > #syz test: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git usb-testing This worked :) Thanks!
