On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 05:00 -0700, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > this is a port from option to sierra of the aggressive support for autosuspend. Thanks again, Oliver for taking the time to make the patch. > This is practically the best you can do under USB 2.0. Very good job, indeed! > If possible you can > use this as a base for autosuspend support. I did implement the patch. We will evaluate this implementation against our requirements and will decide on it. Initial tests indicate perhaps it is a bit too aggressive for us. [PATCH 002/002] that we submitted does present a solution that works for us. The debate with this patch so far is how to handle the situation where some of our devices may contain a firmware revision that does not support autosuspend without adding redundant control to sysfs. > Can you please identify the devices which have trouble suspending right > now, so we can properly add them to the quirk list? I am in a process of collecting such information and performing tests. I will keep you posted when we have a list of devices for the quirks list. Re: patch code: Just a quick question, perhaps I am missing something but I do not see where the "suspended" flag is being set in the driver? Regards, Elina -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
