Re: [PATCH] drivers: usb: core: prefer pr_*() macros over bare printk()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: usb: core: prefer pr_*() macros over bare printk()
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:08:16 +0100
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201203142132.30334-1-info@metux.net>
References: <20201203142132.30334-1-info@metux.net>

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:21:32PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> pr_*() printing helpers are preferred over using bare printk().

Sure, but that's not what you are doing here in this patch :(

Please fix up and resend.

greg k-h

References:
- [PATCH] drivers: usb: core: prefer pr_*() macros over bare printk()
  - From: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult

Prev by Date: RE: Issues with LaCie USB3 drive and UAS
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: usb: storage: prefer pr_*() macros over bare printk()
Previous by thread: [PATCH] drivers: usb: core: prefer pr_*() macros over bare printk()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Media] [Linux Input] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

Powered by Linux