On 29/11/20 9:46 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > There's no more need to dynamically allocate the buffer variable here > now, right? It can be on the stack as the change you made above allows > that to work properly, no need to allocate the buffer twice in a row > (once here and once in the USB core). > > That would make these functions less complex, always a good thing. > > You should check this on the other patches in this series as well. Understood, I will do that. I apologize for the oversight. Thanks, Anant
