On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 00:00 +0100, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: > The current reset framework API does not allow to release what is done by > reset_control_reset(), IOW decrement triggered_count. Add the new > reset_control_rearm() call to do so. > > When reset_control_reset() has been called once, the counter > triggered_count, in the reset framework, is incremented i.e the resource > under the reset is in-use and the reset should not be done again. > reset_control_rearm() would be the way to state that the resource is > no longer used and, that from the caller's perspective, the reset can be > fired again if necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Change since v1: [0] > * Renamed the new call from reset_control_(array_)resettable to > reset_control_(array_)rearm > * Open-coded reset_control_array_rearm to check for errors before > decrementing triggered_count because we cannot roll back in case an > error occurs while decrementing one of the rstc. > * Reworded the new call's description. Thank you, applied to reset/next. regards Philipp
