Re: [PATCH 1/2] console: Remove dummy con_font_op() callback implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 02:46:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:24 PM Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Oh, are we doing an -rc3 backmerge soon? At the moment I can base these
> > patches on neither drm-misc (due to the font_copy removal), nor mainline
> > (due to the signedness issue in font_desc we've talked about), so I'm
> > waiting for a backmerge to rebase everything properly. Sorry that I
> > didn't mention earlier.
> 
> linux-next has all the trees, so you can always use that. And yes I'm
> pushing the backmerge through, so in a few days at most I can pull in
> all your patches. Meanwhile you can base your work of linux-next.
> 
> > > Greg, ok if I just pull these in through drm-misc-next? It's a pretty bad
> > > hairball anyway and that avoids the tree coordination issues. Only thing
> > > that might get in the way is the vt font_copy removal, but that's in -rc3
> > > so easy to backmerge.
> >
> > I will rebase and send everything (including the font_copy
> > garbage-collecting) in a v3 series after the backmerge. Thanks,
> 
> No need to be blocked on a backmerge, this is only needed for merging
> the patches. Development should not be blocked like this.

I see. Thanks!

Peilin Ye




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux