RE: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: usb: add documentation for typec switch simple driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 10:24 PM
> To: Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx;
> gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx; lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx;
> mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx;
> prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; Peter Chen
> <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: usb: add documentation for typec
> switch simple driver
> 
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 5:07 AM Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 6:26 AM
> > > To: Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx; lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx
> > > <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: usb: add documentation for
> > > typec switch simple driver
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:40:07PM +0800, Li Jun wrote:
> > > > Some platforms need a simple driver to do some controls according
> > > > to typec orientation, this can be extended to be a generic driver
> > > > with compatible with "typec-orientation-switch".
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Li Jun <jun.li@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > No changes for v5.
> > > >
> > > > changes on v4:
> > > > - Use compatible instead of bool property for switch matching.
> > > > - Change switch GPIO to be switch simple.
> > > > - Change the active channel selection GPIO to be optional.
> > > >
> > > > previous discussion:
> > > >
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpat
> > > ch
> > > >
> > > work.ozlabs.org%2Fpatch%2F1054342%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjun.li%40nxp
> > > .c
> > > >
> > > om%7C78ca5205695149e2743208d881d9c753%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c30
> > > 16
> > > >
> > > 35%7C0%7C0%7C637402119664101856%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4w
> > > Lj
> > > >
> > > AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdat
> > > a=
> > > > 8TY%2BPRIui6HhxhYE1%2BLmwWL38Vp7SY1Ceb5rGG%2B4DUo%3D&amp;reserved=
> > > > 0
> > > >
> > > >  .../bindings/usb/typec-switch-simple.yaml          | 69
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch-simple.yaml
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch-simple.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..244162d
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch-simple.ya
> > > > +++ ml
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML
> > > > +1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id:
> > > >
> > > +https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fde
> > > +vi
> > > >
> > > +cetree.org%2Fschemas%2Fusb%2Ftypec-switch-simple.yaml%23&amp;data=0
> > > +4%
> > > >
> > > +7C01%7Cjun.li%40nxp.com%7C78ca5205695149e2743208d881d9c753%7C686ea1
> > > +d3
> > > >
> > > +bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637402119664111854%7CUnknown%7CT
> > > +WF
> > > >
> > > +pbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC
> > > +I6
> > > >
> > > +Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=HjWfKlDLyqb%2FKLlL6vdnyPe%2BnB8pSllhokIXQ%2
> > > +Bw
> > > > +yyw8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > > +$schema:
> > > >
> > > +https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fde
> > > +vi
> > > >
> > > +cetree.org%2Fmeta-schemas%2Fcore.yaml%23&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjun.li%
> > > +40
> > > >
> > > +nxp.com%7C78ca5205695149e2743208d881d9c753%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd9
> > > +9c
> > > >
> > > +5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637402119664111854%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWI
> > > +jo
> > > >
> > > +iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&
> > > +am
> > > >
> > > +p;sdata=z0bO47QVl5gw0UE%2Bx3a5E27ALgz568zp%2Bf4suGlch%2Fo%3D&amp;re
> > > +se
> > > > +rved=0
> > > > +
> > > > +title: Typec Orientation Switch Simple Solution Bindings
> > > > +
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > +  - Li Jun <jun.li@xxxxxxx>
> > > > +
> > > > +description: |-
> > > > +  USB SuperSpeed (SS) lanes routing to which side of typec
> > > > +connector is
> > > > +  decided by orientation, this maybe achieved by some simple
> > > > +control like
> > > > +  GPIO toggle.
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > +  compatible:
> > > > +    const: typec-orientation-switch
> > > > +
> > > > +  switch-gpios:
> > > > +    description: |
> > > > +      gpio specifier to switch the super speed active channel,
> > > > +      GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH: GPIO state high for cc1;
> > > > +      GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW:  GPIO state low for cc1.
> > >
> > > What does active mean? There isn't really an active and inactive state,
> right?
> > > It's more a mux selecting 0 or 1 input?
> >
> > Yes, I will change the description:
> > gpio specifier to select the target channel of mux.
> 
> I wonder if the existing mux bindings should be used here.

If only consider typec switch via "gpio", existing "mux-gpio"
binding may be used with property "mux-control-names" to be
"typec-xxx" for match, but we still need create typec stuff at
mux driver to hook to typec system, so little benefit, considering
this binding is going to be for a generic typec orientation switch
simple driver, I think a new typec binding make sense.  

> 
> > > I think you want flags 0 (aka GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH) unless there's an
> > > inverter in the middle.
> >
> > This depends on the switch IC design and board design, leave 2 flags
> > (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) can cover all possible cases.
> >
> > NXP has 2 diff IC parts for this:
> > 1. PTN36043(used on iMX8MQ)
> > Output selection control
> > When SEL=0, RX_AP_*/TX_AP_* are connected to RX_CON_2*/TX_CON_2*, and
> > RX_CON_1*/TX_CON_1* are connected to VDD thru low ohmic resistor.
> > When SEL=1, RX_AP_*/TX_AP_* are connected to RX_CON_1*/TX_CON_1*, and
> > RX_CON_2*/TX_CON_2* are connected to VDD thru low ohmic resistor.
> >
> > Board design connects RX_CON_1*/TX_CON_1* to typec connector CC1, so
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH
> >
> > 2. CBTU02043(used on iMX8MP)
> > SEL        Function
> > --------------------------------------
> > Low        A to B ports and vice versa
> > High       A to C ports and vice versa
> >
> > Board design connects B to typec connector CC1, so GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
> >
> > Therefore, we need 2 flags.
> 
> I'm not saying you don't. Just that the description is a bit odd.
> Please expand the description for how one decides how to set the flags.

Misunderstood your point, OK, I thought the "how to set the flags" was
simple and clear enough:
Use GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH if GPIO physical state high is for cc1; or
Use GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW if GPIO physical state low is for cc1.

> 
> >
> > >
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  port:
> > > > +    type: object
> > > > +    additionalProperties: false
> > > > +    description: -|
> > > > +      Connection to the remote endpoint using OF graph bindings
> > > > + that model
> > > SS
> > > > +      data bus to typec connector.
> > > > +
> > > > +    properties:
> > > > +      endpoint:
> > > > +        type: object
> > > > +        additionalProperties: false
> > > > +
> > > > +        properties:
> > > > +          remote-endpoint: true
> > > > +
> > > > +        required:
> > > > +          - remote-endpoint
> > > > +
> > > > +    required:
> > > > +      - endpoint
> > > > +
> > > > +required:
> > > > +  - compatible
> > > > +  - port
> > > > +
> > > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > > +
> > > > +examples:
> > > > +  - |
> > > > +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > > > +    ptn36043 {
> > > > +        compatible = "typec-orientation-switch";
> > > > +        pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > > +        pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ss_sel>;
> > > > +        switch-gpios = <&gpio3 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > > > +
> > > > +        port {
> > > > +                usb3_data_ss: endpoint {
> > > > +                        remote-endpoint = <&typec_con_ss>;
> > >
> > > The data goes from the connector to here and then where? You need a
> > > connection to the USB host controller.
> >
> > The orientation switch only need interact with type-c, no any
> > interaction with USB controller, do we still need a connection to it?
> 
> If you have 2 USB hosts and 2 connectors (and 2 muxes), how would you describe
> which connector goes with which host?

One instance of typec orientation switch defined by this binding only for
One typec connector. With that, my understanding is
Whether a connection need be described depends on if the connector
(typec driver) need notify the host controller driver to do something
(e.g. role switch need a connection between controller node and connector
node for controller driver to swap usb role). If the mux/switch control is
transparent to usb host controller (e.g. my case, usb controller drivers
normally don't need do anything for orientation change), there is no need
to describe connection between orientation switch node and host controller
node.

Thanks
Li Jun
> 
> Rob




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux