On 02/11/20 3:10 pm, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 03:05 +0530 schrieb Anant Thazhemadam: >> Currently, __usbnet_{read|write}_cmd() use usb_control_msg(). >> However, this could lead to potential partial reads/writes being >> considered valid, and since most of the callers of >> usbnet_{read|write}_cmd() don't take partial reads/writes into account >> (only checking for negative error number is done), and this can lead to >> issues. >> > Hi, > > plesae send this as a post of its own. We cannot take a new set > as a reply to an older set. > > Regards > Oliver > Got it. I will do that. Thanks, Anant