On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 15:18 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 09:08 -0400, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote: > > On 21/10/2020 07.53, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > [Snipped by Vefa] > > > > > > I have no idea why there isn't a match function. Patch v1 had a > > > huge > > > table: > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=157062863431186&w=2 > > > and v2 already didn't had that comment, but no .match function: > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=157114990905421&w=2 > > > > > > I'll prepare a patch that adds a match function. I'll let you > > > (Vefa) > > > look at which of your patches need backporting though, as I'm > > > really > > > quite a bit lost in the different patch sets and branches :/ > > > > Hello Bastien, > > > > Having found the root cause of the issue by going through Pany's > > logs and having proposed a solution, I was hoping to get credit > > for the resolution of the issue by authoring the patch. > > I don't care either way. Attached are the 2 patches I had made and > was > in the process of compiling and testing, feel free to adapt them, > change the authorship, etc. There are also "Co-developed-by", and "Suggested-by" tags which you can use, as per Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst Cheers
