On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > And for the static analysis finding, we need to find a way to ignore this > finding without simply ignoring all findings or new findings that just > look very similar to the original finding, but which are valid. Then I suggest you fix the tool that "flagged" this, surely this is not the only thing it detected with a test like this, right? What tool reported this? thanks, greg k-h
