On 20-09-24 13:09:05, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2020, 17:48 +0300 schrieb Petko Manolov: > > > One possible fix is to add yet another argument to usb_control_msg_recv(), > > which would be the GFP_XYZ flag to pass on to kmemdup(). Up to Greg, of > > course. > > submitted. The problem is those usages that are very hard to trace. I'd > dislike to just slab GFP_NOIO on them for no obvious reason. Do you mean you submitted a patch for usb_control_msg_recv() (because i don't see it on linux-netdev) or i'm reading this all wrong? Petko
