Hi,
(remember to break your lines at 80-columns)
Manish Narani <MNARANI@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
<snip>
>> > + goto err;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + ret = dwc3_xlnx_rst_assert(priv_data->apbrst);
>> > + if (ret < 0) {
>> > + dev_err(dev, "%s: %d: Failed to assert reset\n",
>> > + __func__, __LINE__);
>>
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to assert APB reset\n");
>>
>> > + goto err;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + ret = phy_init(priv_data->usb3_phy);
>>
>> dwc3 core should be handling this already
>
> The USB controller used in Xilinx ZynqMP platform uses xilinx GT phy
> which has 4 GT lanes and can used by 4 peripherals at a time.
At the same time or are they mutually exclusive?
> This USB controller uses 1 GT phy lane among the 4 GT lanes. To
> configure the GT lane for USB controller, the below sequence is
> expected.
>
> 1. Assert the USB controller resets.
> 2. Configure the Xilinx GT phy lane for USB controller (phy_init).
> 3. De-assert the USB controller resets and configure PIPE.
> 4. Wait for PLL of the GT lane used by USB to be locked
> (phy_power_on).
it seems like you need to extend the PHY framework and teach it about
lane configuration.
> The dwc3 core by default does the phy_init() and phy_power_on() but
> the default sequence doesn't work with Xilinx platforms. Because of
> this reason, we have introduced this new driver to support the new
> sequence.
Instead of teaching the relevant framework about your new requirements
;-)
>> > + if (ret < 0) {
>> > + dev_err(dev, "%s: %d: Failed to release reset\n",
>> > + __func__, __LINE__);
>> > + goto err;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + /* Set PIPE power present signal */
>> > + writel(PIPE_POWER_ON, priv_data->regs + PIPE_POWER_OFFSET);
>> > +
>> > + /* Clear PIPE CLK signal */
>> > + writel(PIPE_CLK_OFF, priv_data->regs + PIPE_CLK_OFFSET);
>>
>> shouldn't this be hidden under clk_enable()?
>
> Though its naming suggests something related to clock framework, it is
> a register in the Xilinx USB controller space which configures the
> PIPE clock coming from Serdes.
PIPE clock is a clock. It just so happens that the source is the PHY
itself.
>> > +static int dwc3_xlnx_resume(struct device *dev)
>> > +{
>> > + struct dwc3_xlnx *priv_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> > +
>> > + return clk_bulk_enable(priv_data->num_clocks, priv_data->clks);
>> > +}
>>
>> you have the same implementation for both types of suspend/resume. Maybe
>> extract dwc3_xlnx_{suspend,resume}_common() and just call it from both
>> callbacks?
>
> Going forward we have a plan to add Hibernation handling calls in
> dwc3_xlnx_suspend/resume functions.
at that moment and only at that moment, should you be worried about
splitting them.
> For that reason, these APIs are kept separate. If you insist, I can
> make them common for now and separate them later when I add
> hibernation code.
It would be a little better, no?
cheers
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
