Le jeu. 27 août 2020 à 16:25, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :
Hi,
Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ static int ingenic_usb_phy_init(struct
usb_phy
*phy)
return err;
}
- priv->soc_info->usb_phy_init(phy);
+ reg = priv->soc_info->usb_phy_init(phy);
+ writel(reg, priv->base + REG_USBPCR_OFFSET);
not fixing any bug.
Looking at the code, the bug follows after this line. It would
suffice
to read REG_USBPCR_OFFSET in order to initialize reg. This bug fix
could
have been a one liner.
There's no need to re-read a register when you have the value
readily
available. It just needs to be returned from the usb_phy_init
callbacks. But yes, it's not a one-liner.
there's a difference between making a bug fix and reworking the
behavior
of the driver ;-)
The one-liner is actually what changes the behavior of the driver,
since previously the code did not read back the register.
In this case I guess it's fine, because the register does not have
volatile bits.
@@ -195,19 +196,15 @@ static void ingenic_usb_phy_remove(void
*phy)
usb_remove_phy(phy);
}
-static void jz4770_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy *phy)
+static u32 jz4770_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy *phy)
not a bug fix
{
- struct jz4770_phy *priv = phy_to_jz4770_phy(phy);
- u32 reg;
-
- reg = USBPCR_AVLD_REG | USBPCR_COMMONONN |
USBPCR_IDPULLUP_ALWAYS
|
+ return USBPCR_AVLD_REG | USBPCR_COMMONONN |
USBPCR_IDPULLUP_ALWAYS |
USBPCR_COMPDISTUNE_DFT | USBPCR_OTGTUNE_DFT |
USBPCR_SQRXTUNE_DFT |
USBPCR_TXFSLSTUNE_DFT | USBPCR_TXRISETUNE_DFT |
USBPCR_TXVREFTUNE_DFT |
USBPCR_POR;
- writel(reg, priv->base + REG_USBPCR_OFFSET);
not a bug fix
}
-static void jz4780_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy *phy)
+static u32 jz4780_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy *phy)
not a bug fix
@@ -216,11 +213,10 @@ static void jz4780_usb_phy_init(struct
usb_phy *phy)
USBPCR1_WORD_IF_16BIT;
writel(reg, priv->base + REG_USBPCR1_OFFSET);
- reg = USBPCR_TXPREEMPHTUNE | USBPCR_COMMONONN | USBPCR_POR;
- writel(reg, priv->base + REG_USBPCR_OFFSET);
+ return USBPCR_TXPREEMPHTUNE | USBPCR_COMMONONN | USBPCR_POR;
not a bug fix
}
-static void x1000_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy *phy)
+static u32 x1000_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy *phy)
not a bug fix
{
struct jz4770_phy *priv = phy_to_jz4770_phy(phy);
u32 reg;
@@ -228,13 +224,12 @@ static void x1000_usb_phy_init(struct
usb_phy
*phy)
reg = readl(priv->base + REG_USBPCR1_OFFSET) |
USBPCR1_WORD_IF_16BIT;
writel(reg, priv->base + REG_USBPCR1_OFFSET);
- reg = USBPCR_SQRXTUNE_DCR_20PCT | USBPCR_TXPREEMPHTUNE |
+ return USBPCR_SQRXTUNE_DCR_20PCT | USBPCR_TXPREEMPHTUNE |
USBPCR_TXHSXVTUNE_DCR_15MV | USBPCR_TXVREFTUNE_INC_25PPT |
USBPCR_COMMONONN | USBPCR_POR;
- writel(reg, priv->base + REG_USBPCR_OFFSET);
not a bug fix
}
-static void x1830_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy *phy)
+static u32 x1830_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy *phy)
not a bug fix
{
struct jz4770_phy *priv = phy_to_jz4770_phy(phy);
u32 reg;
@@ -246,9 +241,8 @@ static void x1830_usb_phy_init(struct usb_phy
*phy)
USBPCR1_DMPD | USBPCR1_DPPD;
writel(reg, priv->base + REG_USBPCR1_OFFSET);
- reg = USBPCR_IDPULLUP_OTG | USBPCR_VBUSVLDEXT
| USBPCR_TXPREEMPHTUNE |
+ return USBPCR_IDPULLUP_OTG | USBPCR_VBUSVLDEXT |
USBPCR_TXPREEMPHTUNE |
USBPCR_COMMONONN | USBPCR_POR;
- writel(reg, priv->base + REG_USBPCR_OFFSET);
not a bug fix
Well, if you don't like my bug fix, next time wait for my
Reviewed-by.
why so angry? Take a break every once in a while. Besides, someone
else
already sent the oneliner before you ;-)
I'm just pissed that this patch has not been tested. I don't like
sloppy work.
In any case, why should I wait for your Reviewed-by? Get maintainer
doesn't list you as the maintainer for it. Do you want to update
MAINTAINERS by any chance?
Yes, I thought I was (I'm maintainer of all Ingenic drivers), that also
explains why I wasn't Cc'd for the oneliner patch you mentioned...
IIRC Zhou has a patch to move the driver to drivers/phy/, I'll add
myself as maintainer once it's moved there.
-Paul
