On 8/19/2020 6:15 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:54:39PM +0300, Yehezkel Bernat wrote:
- * @disabled: Disabled by eeprom
+ * @disabled: Disabled by eeprom or enabled, but not implemented
I'm not a native speaker, so I'm not sure about it, but maybe the comma here is
superfluous and just confuses the reader. To me it looks like it means
"(disabled
|| enabled) && !implemented" instead of "disabled || (enabled && !implemented)". >> Any opinion?
For me (also non-native speaker) I don't see a difference but sure I can
remove it :)
I meant the second - "disabled || (enabled && !implemented)"
(also non-native speaker). If the comma confuses the reader please
remove it.
Regards
Nikunj
