On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:36:25AM +0000, WeitaoWang-oc wrote:
>
> On Thu,23 July 2020 04:18:00 +0000 Alex wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:57:48 +0800
> > WeitaoWangoc <WeitaoWang-oc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c | 5 +++++
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c
> > > index 1547aa6..484f2a0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(companions_rwsem);
> > > #define CL_OHCI PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_OHCI
> > > #define CL_EHCI PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_EHCI
> > >
> > > +#define PCI_DEV_DRV_FLAG 2
> > > static inline int is_ohci_or_uhci(struct pci_dev *pdev) {
> > > return pdev->class == CL_OHCI || pdev->class == CL_UHCI; @@
> > > -68,6 +69,8 @@ static void for_each_companion(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct
> > usb_hcd *hcd,
> > > if (companion->class != CL_UHCI && companion->class !=
> > CL_OHCI &&
> > > companion->class != CL_EHCI)
> > > continue;
> > > + if (!(companion->priv_flags & PCI_DEV_DRV_FLAG))
> >
> > But pci_dev.priv_flags is private data for the driver that currently
> > owns the device, which could be vfio-pci. This is really no different
> > than assuming the structure at device.driver_data. If vfio-pci were to
> > make legitimate use of pci_dev.priv_flags, this could simply blow up
> > again. Should there instead be some sort of registration interface
> > where hcd complaint drivers register their devices and only those
> > registered devices can have their driver private data arbitrarily poked
> > by another driver? Thanks,
>
> Thanks for your explanation. Set pci_dev.priv_flags is really not a
> reasonable approach. Are there any more detailed suggestions
> to patch this issue?
This is not a kernel issue, it is a "do not do this in this way from
userspace" issue :)
thanks,
greg k-h
