On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Oliver Neukum<oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2009 02:23:46 schrieb Alexey Klimov: >> I wanna say thank you for spending time for mr800 driver. >> I'm in timeline when i'm preparing 6 or 7 patches for this driver(not >> posted yet to maillist). And my patches will conflict with your patch. >> Generally because of removing usb_amradio_open/close functions and >> radio->users counter. The main reason of removing is needless in them. >> And suspend/resume will be realized in other way.. >> >> So because you are experienced developer i should i ask you what is >> the better option here. Is you patch goes first and i need to change >> mine patchset or other way round? > > Hi, > > no problem. Send me your patches when you will have finished them > and I'll redo mine. Would it be hard for you to leave open/close in the > driver? They are very useful for implementing autosuspend. > > Regards > Oliver Hello, No, it's not hard to me. I'll leave open/close in the diver. One question here: is autosuspend depends on device (operates with hardware and device should support this state) or autosuspend is only software feature? -- Best regards, Klimov Alexey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
