回复: [PATCH v3] usb: gadget: function: fix missing spinlock in f_uac1_legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Greg KH
In the early submission:
"commit id c6994e6f067cf0fc4c6cca3d164018b1150916f8" which add USB Audio Gadget driver "   
the "audio->play_queue" was protected from "audio->lock"
spinlock in "playback_work" func, But in "f_audio_out_ep_complete" func 
there is no protection for the operation of this "audio->play_queue". there
are missing spinlock,  Fix tags should add up here commit?

________________________________________
发件人: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2020年7月7日 3:55
收件人: Zhang, Qiang
抄送: balbi@xxxxxxxxxx; colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: gadget: function: fix missing spinlock in f_uac1_legacy

On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 08:40:27PM +0800, qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add a missing spinlock protection for play_queue, because
> the play_queue may be destroyed when the "playback_work"
> work func and "f_audio_out_ep_complete" callback func
> operate this paly_queue at the same time.

"play_queue", right?

>
> Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Because you do not have a Fixes: tag in here, how far back do you want
the stable patch to go to?  That's why, if you can, it's always good to
have a "Fixes:" tag in there to show what commit caused the problem you
are fixing here.

So, what commit caused this?

thanks,

gre gk-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux