RE: [PATCH v2 7/9] usb: host: xhci-plat: add priv flag for skip_phy_initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
> 
> On 24.5.2020 2.23, Peter Chen wrote:
> > Some DRD controllers (eg, dwc3 & cdns3) have PHY management at their
> > own driver to cover both device and host mode, so add one priv flag
> > for such users to skip PHY management from HCD core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 8 ++++++--
> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.h | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> > b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c index 03d6bbe51919..a3d6cb464186 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> > @@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ static int xhci_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	struct usb_hcd		*hcd;
> >  	int			ret;
> >  	int			irq;
> > +	struct xhci_plat_priv	*priv = NULL;
> > +
> >
> >  	if (usb_disabled())
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -280,8 +282,7 @@ static int xhci_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		priv_match = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >
> >  	if (priv_match) {
> > -		struct xhci_plat_priv *priv = hcd_to_xhci_priv(hcd);h
> > -
> > +		priv = hcd_to_xhci_priv(hcd);
> >  		/* Just copy data for now */
> >  		*priv = *priv_match;
> >  	}
> > @@ -329,6 +330,9 @@ static int xhci_plat_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> >  	hcd->tpl_support = of_usb_host_tpl_support(sysdev->of_node);
> >  	xhci->shared_hcd->tpl_support = hcd->tpl_support;
> > +	if (priv && priv->skip_phy_initialization)
> > +		hcd->skip_phy_initialization = 1;
> > +
> >  	ret = usb_add_hcd(hcd, irq, IRQF_SHARED);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto disable_usb_phy;
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.h
> > b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.h index 1fb149d1fbce..8825e8eb28d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.h
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  struct xhci_plat_priv {
> >  	const char *firmware_name;
> >  	unsigned long long quirks;
> > +	unsigned int skip_phy_initialization:1;
> 
> Any specific reason why this approach was chosen instead of adding a new flag to
> the "long long quirks" above?

I thought the quirks are for hardware, but it seems it could be used for software too.
I will change it by using quirks, thanks.

Peter 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux