Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2020, 10:28 +0200 schrieb Jean Rene Dawin:
Hi,
> But since 0afccd7601514c4b83d8cc58c740089cc447051d
> only when condition
>
> if (!acm->susp_count) {
>
> was also fulfilled:
This is odd, because it is actually a bug to clear a HALT on a
suspended device. Yet you have tested.
Can I ask you to retest (twice removal) with
0afccd7601514c4b83d8cc58c740089cc447051d
so that we can be sure, that it causes this issue?
Regards
Oliver
