On Mon, 11 May 2020, Al Cooper wrote:
> Add a new EHCI driver for Broadcom STB SoC's. A new EHCI driver
> was created instead of adding support to the existing ehci platform
> driver because of the code required to work around bugs in the EHCI
> controller. The primary workaround is for a bug where the Core
> violates the SOF interval between the first two SOFs transmitted after
> resume. This only happens if the resume occurs near the end of a
> microframe. The fix is to intercept the ehci-hcd request to complete
> RESUME and align it to the start of the next microframe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
I hate to point this out...
> +static int ehci_brcm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct resource *res_mem;
> + struct brcm_priv *priv;
> + struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> + int irq;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq <= 0)
> + return irq ? irq : EINVAL;
That should be -EINVAL.
To tell the truth, I'm not sure it's worthwhile checking for irq == 0.
That's up to Greg to decide.
Anyway, as far as I'm concerned you can either change EINVAL to -EINVAL
or change the whole thing back to "if (irq < 0) return irq;". Either
way, you may add:
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Alan Stern
