Re: Testing endpoint halt support for raw-gadget

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 May 2020, Andrey Konovalov wrote:

> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:24 PM Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 4 May 2020, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >
> > > One more question (sorry for so many :).
> > >
> > > Looking at other fields of usb_request struct I see frame_number.
> > > AFAIU it's filled in by the UDC driver for ISO transfers. Does it make
> > > sense to expose it to userspace? I don't see any composite/legacy
> > > gadgets use that field at all.
> >
> > Do any of those gadget drivers use isochronous endpoints?
> 
> Yes, there are audio/uvc function/legacy drivers that use those.
> 
> > In fact, it also looks like none of the drivers in gadget/udc/ touch
> > the frame_number field.  Maybe we should just get rid of it, since it
> > isn't being used.
> 
> It is used by dwc2/3 gadget drivers (which are not in gadget/udc/).

Well, if Felipe thinks we ought to keep the field then you might as 
well export it to userspace.  Drivers are free to ignore it.  :-)

Alan Stern




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux