On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:17:27PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:26:51AM +0530, mani@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add gpiochip support for Maxlinear/Exar USB to serial converter > > for controlling the available gpios. > > > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/usb/serial/xr_serial.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > drivers/usb/serial/xr_serial.h | 7 ++ > > 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/xr_serial.c b/drivers/usb/serial/xr_serial.c > > index ea4a0b167d3f..d86fd40839f8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/xr_serial.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/xr_serial.c > > @@ -476,6 +476,189 @@ static void xr_break_ctl(struct tty_struct *tty, int break_state) > > state); > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB > > + > > [...] > > > + > > +static int xr_gpio_init(struct usb_serial_port *port) > > +{ > > + struct xr_port_private *port_priv = usb_get_serial_port_data(port); > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + if (port_priv->idProduct == XR21V141X_ID) > > + ret = xr21v141x_gpio_init(port); > > + > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + port_priv->gc.label = "xr_gpios"; > > + port_priv->gc.request = xr_gpio_request; > > + port_priv->gc.get_direction = xr_gpio_direction_get; > > + port_priv->gc.direction_input = xr_gpio_direction_input; > > + port_priv->gc.direction_output = xr_gpio_direction_output; > > + port_priv->gc.get = xr_gpio_get; > > + port_priv->gc.set = xr_gpio_set; > > + port_priv->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE; > > + port_priv->gc.parent = &port->dev; > > + port_priv->gc.base = -1; > > + port_priv->gc.can_sleep = true; > > + > > + ret = gpiochip_add_data(&port_priv->gc, port); > > + if (!ret) > > + port_priv->gpio_registered = true; > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static void xr_gpio_remove(struct usb_serial_port *port) > > +{ > > + struct xr_port_private *port_priv = usb_get_serial_port_data(port); > > + > > + if (port_priv->gpio_registered) { > > + gpiochip_remove(&port_priv->gc); > > + port_priv->gpio_registered = false; > > + } > > +} > > + > > +#else > > + > > +static int xr_gpio_init(struct usb_serial_port *port) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void xr_gpio_remove(struct usb_serial_port *port) > > +{ > > + /* Nothing to do */ > > +} > > + > > +#endif > > + > > static int xr_port_probe(struct usb_serial_port *port) > > { > > struct usb_serial *serial = port->serial; > > @@ -495,13 +678,14 @@ static int xr_port_probe(struct usb_serial_port *port) > > > > usb_set_serial_port_data(port, port_priv); > > > > - return 0; > > + return xr_gpio_init(port); > > Just realised that the gpiochip is registered for 2 interfaces exposed by > this chip. This is due to the fact that this chip presents CDC-ACM model, > so there are 2 interfaces (interrupt and bulk IN/OUT). > > We shouldn't need gpiochip for interface 0. So what is the recommended way > to filter that? Not create the gpiochip for interface 0? :) I really don't know what else to say here, sorry. greg k-h