Em Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:53:17 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:23:37 +0200 > Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:02:23AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:55:34PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > NAK, this makes the document significantly harder to read. > > > > > > Really? It reads more easily to me in the new format. Enclosing > > > section headers in [] is really weird. > > > > It wasn't entirely uncommon, but that's not really the point. The > > Problem is all the weird ".." or "::" annotations that really kill > > the flow, or things like "|copy|" that have no reason to exist. > > This sounds sort of like "my markup is good, yours is bad", honestly. If > somebody were trying to add bracketed headings to a new document, I > suspect we'd get similar complaints. > > The markup can certainly be toned down. If you don't like |copy|, it can > just as easily remain "(c)" or become ©, or just go away entirely. That > would get rid of the ".. include:: <isonum.txt>" line too. I would > happily make a rule that we don't bother with markup like |copy| > anywhere in the kernel docs. > > The SPDX line is supposed to exist in all files, of course. > > If Mauro does that, can you live with "::" to mark a literal block? It > doesn't seem like a whole lot of noise...? Yeah, I can remove most of the markups, preserving the "::". Will send a new patchset in a few. Thanks, Mauro
