On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 06:00:48PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > On 8.1.2020 8.24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 09:37:07AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > > > On 07-01-20, 11:51, John Stultz wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:40 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This series add support for Renesas USB controllers uPD720201 and uPD720202. > > > > > These require firmware to be loaded and in case devices have ROM those can > > > > > also be programmed if empty. If ROM is programmed, it runs from ROM as well. > > > > > > > > > > This includes two patches from Christian which supported these controllers > > > > > w/o ROM and later my patches for ROM support and multiple firmware versions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Vinod! > > > > In pushing this series to one of the Android trees for the db845c, > > > > there was some concern raised that this series is adding a lot of > > > > renesas specific logic to the more generic xhci-pci driver. There was > > > > some question if instead that logic should be added to its own > > > > file/module? Do you have any thoughts on this? > > > > > > TBH I have not thought about that and in previous post neither Greg or > > > Mathias gave a feedback that this was not acceptable... > > > > > > We can think about splitting but apart from firmware load there is not > > > much extra functionality that we need to add, the controller behaviour > > > as a standard xhci-pci. So i am not sure if we gain much by splitting. > > > > > > > Also, It seems there hasn't been much feedback on this for a few > > > > months now. Is there a newer version of the patchset I should sync > > > > with? Do you have plans to resubmit soon? > > > > > > Well am still waiting for feedback :( I dont have any update on top of > > > this, I can repost but I dont think that really serves a purpose. > > > > > > I would really like to hear from Greg if this series is acceptable and > > > if not what would he like to see changed. > > > > Greg is not the xhci maintainer :) > > > > Reviewing this always got bumped down on my todo list as other urgent issues > came up. > > I think the concern about adding this amount of renesas specific code to > xhci-pci.c is valid. This series adds over 900 lines of Renesas FW loading > code to a 600 line xhci-pci.c Yeah, that's not good, should be simple to split it into a separate file that's only build if that hardware is selected. thanks, greg k-h