On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:11 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22-10-2019 07:58, John Stultz wrote: > > I'm fine to > > continue digging and working on this approach, but I also don't want > > to have to pollute the core code too much for this oddball hardware > > (esp since doing the vbus control in the role-switch intermediary does > > work ok - or at least better then this approach so far). > > Given the special nature of the hardware I'm fine with the OTG intermediary > approach here. IMHO it is fine to just stick with that and to not spend > too much time on this. Ok. That was what I was leaning towards as well. Thanks again for all the review and feedback here! I really appreciate it! -john
