On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:39 AM David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add an O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE flag that can be passed to pipe2() to indicate > that the pipe being created is going to be used for notifications. This > suppresses the use of splice(), vmsplice(), tee() and sendfile() on the > pipe as calling iov_iter_revert() on a pipe when a kernel notification > message has been inserted into the middle of a multi-buffer splice will be > messy. How messy? And is there some way to make it impossible for this to happen? Adding a new flag to pipe2() to avoid messy kernel code seems like a poor tradeoff.