On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 10:25:32AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 02.10.2019, 17:30 +0300 schrieb Mika Westerberg: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:21:06PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 01.10.2019, 15:53 +0300 schrieb Mika Westerberg: > > > > > > > > > > Are we only going to be allowed to "bond" two links together? Or will > > > > > we be doing more than 2 in the future? If more, then we might want to > > > > > think of a different way to specify these... > > > > > > > > AFAICT only two lanes are available in USB4. This goes over USB type-C > > > > using the two lanes there. > > > > > > > > Of course I don't know if in future there will be USB4 1.1 or something > > > > that adds more lanes so if you think there is a better way to specify > > > > these, I'm happy to implement that instead :) > > > > > > If this ever can become asymmetric this interface is going to turn > > > around and bite. > > > > Don't think it can be asymmetric but I'm open to all ideas how to make > > it more flexible :-) > > Split the the attributes into link_speed_rx and link_speed_tx. For > link_width likewise. We had the same issue with USB. OK, thanks for the suggestion.
