On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:35 AM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:28:22AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:21 AM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:13:14AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:08 AM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:24:04PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > > > > > > syzbot has found a reproducer for the following crash on: > > > > > > > > > > > > HEAD commit: e96407b4 usb-fuzzer: main usb gadget fuzzer driver > > > > > > git tree: https://github.com/google/kasan.git usb-fuzzer > > > > > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13871a4a600000 > > > > > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=cfa2c18fb6a8068e > > > > > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0243cb250a51eeefb8cc > > > > > > compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental) > > > > > > syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=11c4c8e2600000 > > > > > > C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=11d80d2c600000 > > > > > > > > > > > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit: > > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+0243cb250a51eeefb8cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 4 > > > > > > ================================================================== > > > > > > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic64_read > > > > > > include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:836 [inline] > > > > > > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_long_read > > > > > > include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:28 [inline] > > > > > > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x96/0x670 > > > > > > kernel/locking/mutex.c:1211 > > > > > > Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881d1d0aa00 by task kworker/0:1/12 > > > > > > > > > > Let's resend and retest with commit id from latest report to make sure > > > > > the patch was actually applied during the last run: > > > > > > > > The reply contains: > > > > patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=1440268d600000 > > > > that's what's being parsed and applied during testing. > > > > > > Thanks for confirming, but I can't seem to find that link in the report > > > from syzbot: > > > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/000000000000b05ce40592f8521a@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Is it supposed to be there? > > > > I meant the previous one: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/000000000000d290e00592e5c17d@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > The one that you pointed to indeed does not have a patch (was tested > > without any patches). But you did not include any in the request, so > > this WAI. > > Ok, that was what I thought. I first tried retriggering the test by > responding to the mail with the patch and a new test directive, but when > that test failed, I figured the patch had not been applied and that I > had to include it directly in the mail when retesting. > > Apparently misremembered someone from google responding to a patch with > a test directive, but perhaps they also included the patch in that mail. Yes, they probably included. But some developers point to own git tree/branch with the fix (e.g. on github), and then they don't need to attach patch separately. Note the first time you included the patch inline in the email. syzbot understands that too: you can either include inline or attach. So it tested with your patch.
