> For whatever it's worth, I noticed this same bug and wrote the > following patch a couple of years ago. For reasons that escape me now, > the patch was never merged. I suspect it isn't as good as your patch; > what do you think? > I did something similar to that initially too to prove the bug. Although your patch is certainly simpler than mine I think my version makes it clearer that we are looping until the URB has completed rather than just a magic 5 times max. Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
