Hi > Yes. Except that I think the name POWER_BUDGET_3_0 is a little odd. > It implies that this change is specific to USB 3.0 -- but it isn't. > USB 3.1 and 3.2 also have a 900 mA limit, right? > > So please consider changing the name to POWER_BUDGET_3. > > Alan Stern Thank you for your comment. I updated the name from POWER_BUDGET_3_0 to POWER_BUDGET_3 in PATCH v3 and submitted it just now. Regards Jacky
