Re: f_mass_storage vs drivers/target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 13:30 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 14:58 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > 
> > > Ah lovely ... the 338x fails in EP autoconf with f_tcm, digging...
> > > 
> > > While digging I found this gem:
> > > 
> > >     /* USB3380: use same address for usb and hardware endpoints */
> > >     snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "ep%d%s", usb_endpoint_num(desc),
> > >                     usb_endpoint_dir_in(desc) ? "in" : "out");
> > >     ep = gadget_find_ep_by_name(_gadget, name);
> > >     if (ep && usb_gadget_ep_match_desc(_gadget, ep, desc, ep_comp))
> > >             return ep;
> > > 
> > > Any idea what's that supposed to achieve ?
> 
> It looks like in one mode, the endpoint number has to be the value 
> predetermined by the hardware.  In the other mode, any hardware 
> endpoint can be assigned any endpoint number.

Sure but as I wrote, this is ep_match, which when called, always has
usb_endpoint_num() set to 0... this function is supposed to chose the
EP number afaik. So I don't think the above ever works, it just returns
NULL. Or do we ever call this again with already predetermined EP nums,
for example when doing multifunction ?

> > > When ep_match is called, usb_endpoint_num() hasn't been set yet so
> > > it's always 0 and always fails... or am I missing something ?
> > 
> > Two problems:
> > 
> >  - net2280.c doesn't set a max EP size, so autoconfig fails since
> > f_tcm specifies one. What about this ?
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
> > @@ -940,12 +940,14 @@ int usb_gadget_ep_match_desc(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
> >         if (usb_endpoint_dir_out(desc) && !ep->caps.dir_out)
> >                 return 0;
> >  
> > -       if (max > ep->maxpacket_limit)
> > +       if (ep->maxpacket_limit && max > ep->maxpacket_limit)
> >                 return 0;
> > 
> > (ie assume that ep->maxpacket_limit 0 means the UDC supports any
> > legal size)
> 
> That looks reasonable.

I'll send a patch.

> >  - No UDC driver other than dummy sets max_streams, and f_tcm requires 4,
> > so f_tcm will fail with *any* superspeed UDC driver as far as I can tell.
> > 
> > Was it ever tested with USB 3 ?
> 
> Note that USB 2 does not support streams at all.

Yes, f_tcm only requires them for superspeed, but it does *require*
them in that case.

> > I'm not sure what the right fix here yet is as I yet have to learn about
> > what those USB3 streams are :-) For now I've commented things out.
> 
> They are for multiplexing multiple data streams over a single USB 
> endpoint.  As far as I know, the only use case for such a thing is USB 
> Mass Storage.

So f_tcm could operate in a degraded mode in the absence of streams
easily, the problem is the mechanics of EP matching in epautoconf. It
will just fail.

I wonder since f_tcm is also the only user, whether we could change the
matching logic to either:

  - Don't try to match, return streams is available. This could be
problematic if the UDC supports streams on some EPs and not others
however.

  - Do two passes: one pass trying to match the streams, and one patch
without matching them if the first one fails.

Then f_tcm could check whether it got EPs with streams and enable
stream usage accordingly.

Opinions ? Other option ?

Cheers,
Ben.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux