Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> + wait_event(desc->wait,
> + /*
> + * needs both flags. We cannot do with one
> + * because resetting it would cause a race
> + * with write() yet we need to signal
> + * a disconnect
> + */
> + !test_bit(WDM_IN_USE, &desc->flags) &&
> + test_bit(WDM_DISCONNECTING, &desc->flags));
I'm confused now... Won't this condition always be false?
Should be
wait_event(desc->wait,
!test_bit(WDM_IN_USE, &desc->flags) ||
test_bit(WDM_DISCONNECTING, &desc->flags));
instead, or?
Bjørn
