Hey Sean,
On 13/08/2019 04.10, Sean Young wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:21:39AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 06:11 +0100, Sean Young wrote:
>>> syzbot reports an error on flush_request_modules() for the second device.
>>> This workqueue was never initialised so simply remove the offending line.
>>>
>>> usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
>>> em28xx 1-1:1.153: Disconnecting em28xx #1
>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12 at kernel/workqueue.c:3031
>>> __flush_work.cold+0x2c/0x36 kernel/workqueue.c:3031
>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
>>> CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc2+ #25
>>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
>>> Google 01/01/2011
>>> Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event
>>> Call Trace:
>>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
>>> dump_stack+0xca/0x13e lib/dump_stack.c:113
>>> panic+0x2a3/0x6da kernel/panic.c:219
>>> __warn.cold+0x20/0x4a kernel/panic.c:576
>>> report_bug+0x262/0x2a0 lib/bug.c:186
>>> fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:179 [inline]
>>> fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:174 [inline]
>>> do_error_trap+0x12b/0x1e0 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:272
>>> do_invalid_op+0x32/0x40 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:291
>>> invalid_op+0x23/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1026
>>> RIP: 0010:__flush_work.cold+0x2c/0x36 kernel/workqueue.c:3031
>>> Code: 9a 22 00 48 c7 c7 20 e4 c5 85 e8 d9 3a 0d 00 0f 0b 45 31 e4 e9 98 86
>>> ff ff e8 51 9a 22 00 48 c7 c7 20 e4 c5 85 e8 be 3a 0d 00 <0f> 0b 45 31 e4
>>> e9 7d 86 ff ff e8 36 9a 22 00 48 c7 c7 20 e4 c5 85
>>> RSP: 0018:ffff8881da20f720 EFLAGS: 00010286
>>> RAX: 0000000000000024 RBX: dffffc0000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8128a0fd RDI: ffffed103b441ed6
>>> RBP: ffff8881da20f888 R08: 0000000000000024 R09: fffffbfff11acd9a
>>> R10: fffffbfff11acd99 R11: ffffffff88d66ccf R12: 0000000000000000
>>> R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8881c6685df8 R15: ffff8881d2a85b78
>>> flush_request_modules drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c:3325 [inline]
>>> em28xx_usb_disconnect.cold+0x280/0x2a6
>>> drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c:4023
>>> usb_unbind_interface+0x1bd/0x8a0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:423
>>> __device_release_driver drivers/base/dd.c:1120 [inline]
>>> device_release_driver_internal+0x404/0x4c0 drivers/base/dd.c:1151
>>> bus_remove_device+0x2dc/0x4a0 drivers/base/bus.c:556
>>> device_del+0x420/0xb10 drivers/base/core.c:2288
>>> usb_disable_device+0x211/0x690 drivers/usb/core/message.c:1237
>>> usb_disconnect+0x284/0x8d0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2199
>>> hub_port_connect drivers/usb/core/hub.c:4949 [inline]
>>> hub_port_connect_change drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5213 [inline]
>>> port_event drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5359 [inline]
>>> hub_event+0x1454/0x3640 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5441
>>> process_one_work+0x92b/0x1530 kernel/workqueue.c:2269
>>> process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2331 [inline]
>>> worker_thread+0x7ab/0xe20 kernel/workqueue.c:2417
>>> kthread+0x318/0x420 kernel/kthread.c:255
>>> ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
>>> Kernel Offset: disabled
>>> Rebooting in 86400 seconds..
>>>
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+b7f57261c521087d89bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>
>> I reviewed the syzbot report, but was left head-scratching and
>> failing to see how the module-loading worker was supposed to be used :-)
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Also, this seems a bug, so how about this tag?
>>
>> Fixes: be7fd3c3a8c5e ("media: em28xx: Hauppauge DualHD second tuner functionality)
> Would you mind reviewing this change please Brad? You added the dual_ts
> feature to the driver so it would be good to have your view on this.
>
> Thanks
> Sean
Hmmm. I've never encountered this oops, nor had it reported to me. Looks
like the second device indeed never calls request_modules, and when I
did the cleanup I just duplicated all the teardown. Since everything
works without the second workqueue already, I don't think the second
device needs to initialize it's own. So, I think your solution is proper.
Reviewed-by: Brad Love <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c | 1 -
>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
>>> index 6e33782c3ca6..5983e72a0622 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
>>> @@ -4019,7 +4019,6 @@ static void em28xx_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
>>> dev->dev_next->disconnected = 1;
>>> dev_info(&dev->intf->dev, "Disconnecting %s\n",
>>> dev->dev_next->name);
>>> - flush_request_modules(dev->dev_next);
>>> }
>>>
>>> dev->disconnected = 1;
