On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:16 AM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:52:19PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 1:07 PM syzbot > > <syzbot+cf35b76f35e068a1107f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > HEAD commit: 7829a896 usb-fuzzer: main usb gadget fuzzer driver > > (...) > > > __gpio_set_value include/asm-generic/gpio.h:104 [inline] > > > gpio_set_value include/linux/gpio.h:71 [inline] > > > nfcmrvl_chip_halt+0x4e/0x70 drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c:259 > > > nfcmrvl_nci_register_dev+0x2d4/0x378 drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c:176 > > > nfcmrvl_probe+0x4e9/0x5e0 drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/usb.c:344 > > > > This bug is somewhere in the drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl* code handling > > GPIOs. > > Right, and it's my bug. > > > It should be converted to GPIO descriptors and fixed up, see > > drivers/gpio/TODO for details on how to do this. > > Conversion will have to wait, let's fix the regression first. :) > > > Johan/Vincent, tell me if you want me to forward the full fuzzing > > robot crash dump. > > No need, thanks. I got it the report. > > Something like the below compiles and should fix it. Vacation starts > today so I'll revisit and send a proper patch in a couple of weeks. > > Perhaps someone can feed it to the bot meanwhile (no time to play with > it right now). > > Note that this issue has been there since 4.12, so guess no one uses > these devices... > > Johan > > > From e9d9d0ef5ffd6b306cffb2f4e2514f503aa626a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:07:13 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] NFC: nfcmrvl: fix gpio-handling regression > > FIXME > > Fixes: e33a3f84f88f ("NFC: nfcmrvl: allow gpio 0 for reset signalling") > Not-Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> Please don't forget: > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit: > Reported-by: syzbot+cf35b76f35e068a1107f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/usb.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c > index e65d027b91fa..529be35ac178 100644 > --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c > +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c > @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ void nfcmrvl_chip_reset(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv) > /* Reset possible fault of previous session */ > clear_bit(NFCMRVL_PHY_ERROR, &priv->flags); > > - if (priv->config.reset_n_io) { > + if (gpio_is_valid(priv->config.reset_n_io)) { > nfc_info(priv->dev, "reset the chip\n"); > gpio_set_value(priv->config.reset_n_io, 0); > usleep_range(5000, 10000); > @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void nfcmrvl_chip_reset(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv) > > void nfcmrvl_chip_halt(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv) > { > - if (priv->config.reset_n_io) > + if (gpio_is_valid(priv->config.reset_n_io)) > gpio_set_value(priv->config.reset_n_io, 0); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/usb.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/usb.c > index 945cc903d8f1..888e298f610b 100644 > --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/usb.c > +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/usb.c > @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ static int nfcmrvl_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, > > /* No configuration for USB */ > memset(&config, 0, sizeof(config)); > + config.reset_n_io = -EINVAL; > > nfc_info(&udev->dev, "intf %p id %p\n", intf, id); > > -- > 2.22.0 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/20190717091621.GC16694%40localhost. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.