Re: Pass transfer_buffer to gadget drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:25 PM Felipe Balbi
<felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> > I've noticed that when the host performs a control request,
> >> > urb->transfer_buffer/transfer_buffer_length are not passed to the
> >> > gadget drivers via the setup() call, the only thing that is passed is
> >> > the usb_ctrlrequest struct. Is there a way to get the transfer_buffer
> >> > from within a gadget driver? If not, what approach would the best to
> >> > implement this?
> >>
> >> I think you need to further explain what you mean here.
> >>
> >> What do you mean by gadget driver in this case?
> >>
> >> If you mean the drivers under drivers/usb/gadget/{function,legacy}
> >> directories then there's no way that they can have access to anything
> >> from the host.
> >>
> >> Remember that gadget and host are two completely distinct units. The
> >> only thing they share is a USB cable. When it comes to Control
> >> Transfers, if a data stage is necessary, that must be encoded in the
> >> wLength field of the control structure.
> >>
> >> Also, host side does *not* pass its usb_ctrlrequest struct to the
> >> gadget, it passes a series of 8 bytes which are oblivious to where in
> >> memory they were from the host point of view.
> >>
> >> If if you have the same machine acting as both host and device, each
> >> side has no knowledge of that fact.
> >
> > Hi Felipe,
> >
> > What I meant is that any module (gadget driver) that implements
> > usb_gadget_driver struct callbacks and registers it, will only get
> > usb_ctrlrequest through the setup() callback, but not the
> > transfer_buffer/length.
>
> A control request is *always* 8 bytes. That's mandated by the USB
> specification.
>
> > And therefore it can't access the data that is
> > attached to a control request.
>
> There is no data attached to a control request. A Control Transfer is
> composed of 2 or 3 stages:
>
> - SETUP stage
>         an 8 byte transfer descriptor type thing
>
> - (optional) Data stage
>         if wLength of control request contains a value > 0, then this
>         stage fires up to transfer the amount of data communicated in
>         wLength (during previous stage).
>
> - Status Stage
>         A zero length transfer to communicate successful end of transfer
>         (in case it completes fine) or an error (in case of STALL
>         condition).

Hm, then why does the usb_control_msg() function accepts a data and
size arguments? Which are described in the comment as "pointer to the
data to send" and "length in bytes of the data to send" accordingly?
Or is this the buffer for the response?

>
> > I've faced this with a custom implementation of a gadget driver module
> > while using the dummy_hcd module, but I AFAIU it's not relevant to
> > those two, but rather to the whole gadget subsystem.
>
> What is this custom gadget doing? Which kernel version are you using?
> What error are you facing? Could it be that you misunderstood how USB
> works?

The details are here: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg179158.html

But my question is not related to that custom gadget.

>
> Best regards
>
> --
> balbi



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux