On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 11:50:14AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > usb_control messages are slow and should not be on the "fast path" of > > any data being sent through the device. Any overhead of the > > kmalloc/kfree is totally eaten up by the actual transmission turn around > > time of the message itself, so you don't have to worry about the > > performance impact. > > Yeah, I don't like the original version either. Even if the kmalloc's > aren't a big performance hit, the failure path sucks. I've included a > new version below, but unfortunately I haven't had a chance to test it. > Please give it a try if you get a chance? Looks good to me, a bit cleaner even. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
