Hi Min,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:19:42PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 15/01/2019 02:43, min.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Min Guo <min.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add a common interface for set data toggle
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Min Guo <min.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > index b59ce9a..16d0ba4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > @@ -306,6 +306,25 @@ static inline void musb_save_toggle(struct musb_qh *qh, int is_in,
> > usb_settoggle(urb->dev, qh->epnum, !is_in, csr ? 1 : 0);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline u16 musb_set_toggle(struct musb_qh *qh, int is_in,
> > + struct urb *urb)
> > +{
> > + u16 csr = 0;
> > + u16 toggle = 0;
> > +
> > + toggle = usb_gettoggle(urb->dev, qh->epnum, !is_in);
> > +
> > + if (is_in)
> > + csr = toggle ? (MUSB_RXCSR_H_WR_DATATOGGLE
> > + | MUSB_RXCSR_H_DATATOGGLE) : 0;
> > + else
> > + csr = toggle ? (MUSB_TXCSR_H_WR_DATATOGGLE
> > + | MUSB_TXCSR_H_DATATOGGLE)
> > + : MUSB_TXCSR_CLRDATATOG;
>
> Can we switch the if and use is_out logic as function parameter. This would make
> the code easier to understand.
based on the current implementation in patch 4/4, I don't think we need
this separate patch any more, but Matthias' comments still apply.
Regards,
-Bin.
